Michael Medved has an interesting column on the disconnect between Democrats' lives and their speech. Specifically, that the Democrats who spoke at the DNC convention are examples of how people can start humbly and make it big in this country, but Dems assume no one else can make it without government support.
On the one hand, they want Americans to believe that we live in a dark, destitute moment in our history, with no chance for prosperity or progress unless a Democrat captures the White House.
On the other hand, they celebrate dozens of inspiring rags-to-riches stories (like those of the party’s sweethearts, Barack and Michelle Obama) proving that traditional American values still bring spectacular and gratifying results.
First, they suggest that ordinary Americans can’t possibly achieve their dreams without government help.
But then, sometimes in the very same speeches, they brag about their own classic American stories in which family and faith conquer every obstacle.
Indeed, the life stories of Barack and Michelle Obama aren't filled with government aids to their personal dreams. Their stories are filled with hard work and personal achievement. This contrasts with arguments I've seen lately that imply that only those born with wealth can get ahead in life.
If we really were a static society, government intervention might solve the problem. But we don't live in such a society. There are simply far too many success stories that counter that notion.
There seems to be a real disconnect between the way Democrats have lived their lives and the portrait of life they paint for others. If Barack Obama, who came from a very disadvantaged background, could achieve what he has through family and hard work, why do Democrats assume no one else can?
|