As could have been predicted, the Democrats are backing down from requiring timetables for the Iraqi War funding bill, after failing to override President Bush's veto.
President Bush and congressional leaders began negotiating a second war funding bill yesterday, with Democrats offering the first major concession: an agreement to drop their demand for a timeline to bring troops home from Iraq.
Democrats backed off after the House failed, on a vote of 222 to 203, to override the president's veto of a $124 billion measure that would have required U.S. forces to begin withdrawing as early as July. But party leaders made it clear that the next bill will have to include language that influences war policy. Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) outlined a second measure that would step up Iraqi accountability, "transition" the U.S. military role and show "a reasonable way to end this war."
"We made our position clear. He made his position clear. Now it is time for us to try to work together," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) said after a White House meeting. "But make no mistake: Democrats are committed to ending this war."
Bush said he is "confident that we can reach agreement," and he assigned three top aides to negotiate. White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten, national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley and budget director Rob Portman will go to Capitol Hill today to sit down with leaders of both parties.
Keep putting lipstick on that pig, Nancy, and you might believe it ain't a pig at some point.
The nutroots are throwing a tantrum. Some of it is more shrill than others.
I notice liberals appealing consistently to the idea that "the American people" want the soldiers to leave. But curiously, on other issues where the American people have said they want something (such as greater restrictions on abortion), the Democrats aren't real interested in doing the will of "the American people." Quite opportunistic, this doing the will of the people is.
|