This seems about right to me. In general, transparency is necessary to keep elections free and open. The justices held open the idea that plaintiffs might be able to win on a narrower argument, namely, that, in their case, disclosing the names and addresses would leave them subject to harassment and threats.
Friday, June 25, 2010
High Court Rejects Effort to Keep Names of Petition Signers Secret
Posted by sharon at 10:03 AM
Labels: Elections, Homosexuality, Legal stuff, Supreme Court
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
|